Comparing treatment fidelity between study arms of a randomized controlled clinical trial for stroke family caregivers

dc.contributor.authorMcLennon, Susan M.
dc.contributor.authorHancock, Rebecca D.
dc.contributor.authorRedelman, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorScarton, Lisa L.
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorSweeney, Bobbie
dc.contributor.authorHabermann, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorJessup, Nenette M.
dc.contributor.authorBakas, Tamilyn
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-13T19:54:54Z
dc.date.available2018-03-13T19:54:54Z
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare treatment fidelity among treatment arms in the Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit study for stroke caregivers (TASK II) with respect to: 1) protocol adherence; 2) intervention dosage and 3) nurse intervener perspectives. DESIGN: A randomized controlled clinical trial design. SETTING: Urban, community, midwestern United States. SUBJECTS: A total of 254 stroke caregivers (mean ±SD age, 54.4 ±11.8 years), 55 (22.0%) males and 199 (78.4%) females) randomized to the TASK II intervention (n=123) or an Information, Support, and Referral comparison group (n=131). INTERVENTIONS: TASK II participants received the TASK II Resource Guide; Information, Support, and Referral participants received a standard caregiver brochure. At approximately 8 weeks after discharge, both groups received 8 weekly calls from a nurse, with a booster call 4 weeks later. MEASURES: Protocol adherence was evaluated with the TASK II Checklist for Monitoring Adherence. Intervention dosage was measured by the number of minutes caregivers spent reading materials and talking with the nurse. Nurse intervener perspectives were obtained through focus groups. RESULTS: Protocol adherence was 80% for the TASK II and 92% for the Information, Support, and Referral. As expected, intervention dosage differed between TASK II and Information, Support, and Referral with respect to caregiver time spent reading materials (t=-6.49; P<.001) and talking with the nurse (t=-7.38; P<.001). Focus groups with nurses yielded further evidence for treatment fidelity and recommendations for future trials. CONCLUSIONS: These findings substantiate treatment fidelity in both study arms of the TASK II stroke caregiver intervention trial (NIH R01NR010388; ClinicalTrials.govNCT01275495).en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationMcLennon, S. M., Hancock, R. D., Redelman, K., Scarton, L. L., Riley, E., Sweeney, B., … Bakas, T. (2016). Comparing treatment fidelity between study arms of a randomized controlled clinical trial for stroke family caregivers. Clinical Rehabilitation, 30(5), 495–507. http://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515585134en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/15488
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/0269215515585134en_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Rehabilitationen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectFamily caregiversen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectBehavioral researchen_US
dc.subjectTelephone assessmenten_US
dc.titleComparing treatment fidelity between study arms of a randomized controlled clinical trial for stroke family caregiversen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms753820.pdf
Size:
640.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: