Epistemic Peerhood in the Law
| dc.contributor.author | Wright, R. George | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-22T21:02:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-22T21:02:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The quality of discussion and decision making in various legal contexts often displays substantial departures from the ideal. This Article points to a useful framework with which to understand many such departures. The framework in question also points the way to healthier decision-making processes in the law and to more substantively defensible outcomes of such legal decision-making processes. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | 91 St. John's Law Review 663 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/23926 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.title | Epistemic Peerhood in the Law | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |