Performance of near infared digital imaging transillumination for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries

dc.contributor.advisorAndo, Masatoshi
dc.contributor.authorAbogazalah, Naif Nabel Fouad
dc.contributor.otherDiefenderfer, Kim Edward
dc.contributor.otherPlatt, Jeffrey A.
dc.contributor.otherHara, Anderson T.
dc.contributor.otherCook, Norman Blaine
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-07T20:24:36Z
dc.date.available2016-09-07T20:24:36Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-01
dc.degree.date2016en_US
dc.degree.disciplineSchool of Dentistryen
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelM.S.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objectives of this in-vitro study were: 1) to evaluate the ability of Near-Infrared Digital Imaging Transillumination (NIDIT) to detect non-cavitated approximal caries lesions; and 2) to compare the performance among NIDIT, Digital Radiography (DR), Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic Trans-Illumination (DIFOTI) and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). Methods: Thirty human extracted premolars were selected. The approximal surface status ranged from sound to surfaces with non-cavitated caries lesions into the outer one-third of the dentin. Lesion depth was determined by micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) and used as a gold standard. Teeth were mounted in a custom-made device to simulate approximal contact. ICDAS, DR, DIFOTI and NIDIT examinations were performed and repeated by three trained and calibrated examiners. Sensitivity, specificity, area under ROC curve (Az), inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) of each method, and correlation among the methods were determined. Results: ICCs for intra-/inter-examiner agreement were almost perfect for DIFOTI (0.85/0.83), substantial for ICDAS (0.79/0.72) and NIDIT (0.69/0.64), and moderate for DR (0.52/0.48). Sensitivity/specificity for DIFOTI, ICDAS, DR, and NIDIT were 0.91/0.69, 0.89/0.83, 0.50/0.64, and 0.68/0.93, respectively. Az of DR (0.61) was significantly lower than that of DIFOTI (0.91, p = 0.002) and ICDAS (0.90, p = 0.005), but was not significantly different from NIDIT (0.81, p = 0.052). DIFOTI, ICDAS, and NIDIT were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.13). Spearman correlation coefficients for DIFOTI (0.79, p < 0.001), ICDAS (0.74, p < 0.001), and NIDIT (0.65, p < 0.001) demonstrated a moderate association with μ-CT, while that of DR suggested no association (0.19, p = 0.289). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, NIDIT system demonstrated a potential for early approximal caries detection. ICDAS, DIFOTI, and NIDIT were superior to DR in terms of validity and reliability.en_US
dc.embargo1 yearen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.7912/C2FW8G
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/10876
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/1542
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectNear Infrared Digital Imaging Transilluminationen_US
dc.subjectCaries Detectionen_US
dc.subjectNIDITen_US
dc.subjectICDASen_US
dc.subjectDIFOTIen_US
dc.subjectBitewing Radiographyen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Cariesen_US
dc.subject.meshTransilluminationen_US
dc.subject.meshRadiography, Bitewingen_US
dc.titlePerformance of near infared digital imaging transillumination for detection of non-cavitated approximal cariesen_US
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Abogazalah_MSDThesis .pdf
Size:
5.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: