Robust tests for gene–environment interaction in case-control and case-only designs

Date
2019-01
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Elsevier
Abstract

The case-control and case-only designs are commonly used to detect the gene–environment (G–E) interaction. In principle, the tests based on these two designs require a pre-specified genetic model to achieve an expected power of detecting the G–E interaction. Unfortunately, for most complex diseases the underlying genetic models are unknown. It is well known that mis-specification of the genetic model can result in a substantial loss of power in the detection of the main genetic effect. However, limited effort has been dedicated to the study of G–E interaction. This issue has been investigated in this article with a conclusion that the genetic model mis-specification can not only undermine the power of detecting G–E interaction in both case-control and case-only designs but also distort the type I error rate in case-control design. To tackle this problem, a class of robust tests, namely MAX3, have been proposed for both the case-control and case-only designs. The proposed tests can well control the type I error rate and yield satisfactory power even when the genetic model is mis-specified. The asymptotic distribution and the

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Zang, Y., Fung, W. K., Cao, S., Ng, H. K. T., & Zhang, C. (2019). Robust tests for gene–environment interaction in case-control and case-only designs. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 129, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2018.08.014
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Rights
Publisher Policy
Source
Author
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}