Burke, Michael B.2016-02-182016-02-181992Analysis 52 (1): 12-17.https://hdl.handle.net/1805/8357On the most popular account of material constitution, it is common for a material object to coincide precisely with one or more other material objects, ones that are composed of just the same matter but differ from it in sort. I argue that there is nothing that could ground the alleged difference in sort and that the account must be rejected.encoinciding objectsmaterial constitutionArticle